BASS v. UNITED STATES, 358 U.S. 333 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court
BASS v. UNITED STATES, 358 U.S. 333 (1959)
358 U.S. 333 BASS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 528.
Decided January 26, 1959.
163 F. Supp. 1, affirmed.
Wilbert G. Burnette for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, W. Louise Florencourt, Robert W. Ginnane and Carroll T. Prince, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.
Linwood C. Major, Jr. for the Atlantic Greyhound Corporation et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, 358 U.S. 333 (1959)
358 U.S. 333 LANZA v. NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 532.
Decided January 26, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 27 N. J. 516, 143 A. 2d 571.
Vito F. Lanza for appellant.
David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Bernard Hellring for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
BASS v. UNITED STATES, 358 U.S. 333 (1959)
358 U.S. 333 BASS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 528.
Decided January 26, 1959.
163 F. Supp. 1, affirmed.
Wilbert G. Burnette for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, W. Louise Florencourt, Robert W. Ginnane and Carroll T. Prince, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.
Linwood C. Major, Jr. for the Atlantic Greyhound Corporation et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, 358 U.S. 333 (1959)
358 U.S. 333 LANZA v. NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 532.
Decided January 26, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 27 N. J. 516, 143 A. 2d 571.
Vito F. Lanza for appellant.
David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Bernard Hellring for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
