BASS v. UNITED STATES, 358 U.S. 333 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

BASS v. UNITED STATES, 358 U.S. 333 (1959) 358 U.S. 333

BASS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 528.
Decided January 26, 1959.

 163 F. Supp. 1, affirmed.

Wilbert G. Burnette for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, W. Louise Florencourt, Robert W. Ginnane and Carroll T. Prince, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Linwood C. Major, Jr. for the Atlantic Greyhound Corporation et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/358/333/case.html">358 U.S. 333</a> (1959) 358 U.S. 333 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, 358 U.S. 333 (1959) 358 U.S. 333

LANZA v. NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 532.
Decided January 26, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 27 N. J. 516, 143 A.2d 571.

Vito F. Lanza for appellant.

David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Bernard Hellring for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 358 U.S. 333, 334

 


U.S. Supreme Court

BASS v. UNITED STATES, 358 U.S. 333 (1959) 358 U.S. 333

BASS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 528.
Decided January 26, 1959.

 163 F. Supp. 1, affirmed.

Wilbert G. Burnette for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, W. Louise Florencourt, Robert W. Ginnane and Carroll T. Prince, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Linwood C. Major, Jr. for the Atlantic Greyhound Corporation et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/358/333/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/358/333/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/358/333/">358 U.S. 333</a></a></a> (1959) 358 U.S. 333 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, 358 U.S. 333 (1959) 358 U.S. 333

LANZA v. NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 532.
Decided January 26, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 27 N. J. 516, 143 A.2d 571.

Vito F. Lanza for appellant.

David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Bernard Hellring for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 358 U.S. 333, 334

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.