SOMERVILLE MILLING v. WORCESTER NORTH SAV. INSTITUTION, 358 U.S. 278 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

SOMERVILLE MILLING v. WORCESTER NORTH SAV. INSTITUTION, 358 U.S. 278 (1959)

358 U.S. 278

SOMERVILLE MILLING CO. ET AL. v. WORCESTER NORTH SAVINGS INSTITUTION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
No. 495.
Decided January 12, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 101 N. H. 307, 141 A. 2d 885.

Angus M. MacNeil for appellants.

Stanley M. Burns for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to strike the motion to dismiss is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 358 U.S. 278, 279




U.S. Supreme Court

SOMERVILLE MILLING v. WORCESTER NORTH SAV. INSTITUTION, 358 U.S. 278 (1959)

358 U.S. 278

SOMERVILLE MILLING CO. ET AL. v. WORCESTER NORTH SAVINGS INSTITUTION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
No. 495.
Decided January 12, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 101 N. H. 307, 141 A. 2d 885.

Angus M. MacNeil for appellants.

Stanley M. Burns for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to strike the motion to dismiss is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 358 U.S. 278, 279

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.