BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958) 358 U.S. 205

BRIGGS, DOING BUSINESS AS WALT'S AUTO PARKS & GARAGES, v. CITY
OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE

DISTRICT. No. 453.
Decided December 15, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 154 Cal. App. 2d 642, 316 P.2d 408.

Morris Lavine for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 358 U.S. 205, 206

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958) 358 U.S. 205 BRIGGS, DOING BUSINESS AS WALT'S AUTO PARKS & GARAGES, v. CITY
OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE

DISTRICT. No. 453.
Decided December 15, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 154 Cal. App. 2d 642, 316 P.2d 408.

Morris Lavine for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 358 U.S. 205, 206