BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958)
358 U.S. 205 BRIGGS, DOING BUSINESS AS WALT'S AUTO PARKS & GARAGES, v. CITY
OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT.
No. 453.Decided December 15, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 154 Cal. App. 2d 642, 316 P.2d 408.
Morris Lavine for appellant.
Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958)
358 U.S. 205 BRIGGS, DOING BUSINESS AS WALT'S AUTO PARKS & GARAGES, v. CITY
OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT.
No. 453.Decided December 15, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 154 Cal. App. 2d 642, 316 P.2d 408.
Morris Lavine for appellant.
Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Page 358 U.S. 205, 206
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
