BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958)

358 U.S. 205

BRIGGS, DOING BUSINESS AS WALT'S AUTO PARKS & GARAGES, v. CITY
OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE

DISTRICT.

No. 453.
Decided December 15, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 154 Cal. App. 2d 642, 316 P.2d 408.

Morris Lavine for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 358 U.S. 205, 206




U.S. Supreme Court

BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958)

358 U.S. 205

BRIGGS, DOING BUSINESS AS WALT'S AUTO PARKS & GARAGES, v. CITY
OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE

DISTRICT.

No. 453.
Decided December 15, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 154 Cal. App. 2d 642, 316 P.2d 408.

Morris Lavine for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 358 U.S. 205, 206

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.