ULLNER v. OHIO, 358 U.S. 131 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
ULLNER v. OHIO, 358 U.S. 131 (1958)
358 U.S. 131 ULLNER v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 426.
Decided December 8, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 167 Ohio St. 521, 150 N. E. 2d 413.
Robert P. Goldman for appellant.
Morton B. Icove filed a brief for the Ohio Civil Liberties Union et al., as amici curiae, in support of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
VAN NEWKIRK v. McNEILL, 358 U.S. 131 (1958)
358 U.S. 131 VAN NEWKIRK v. McNEILL, SUPERINTENDENT, MATTEAWAN STATE HOSPITAL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 258, Misc.
Decided December 8, 1958.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
ULLNER v. OHIO, 358 U.S. 131 (1958)
358 U.S. 131 ULLNER v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 426.
Decided December 8, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 167 Ohio St. 521, 150 N. E. 2d 413.
Robert P. Goldman for appellant.
Morton B. Icove filed a brief for the Ohio Civil Liberties Union et al., as amici curiae, in support of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
VAN NEWKIRK v. McNEILL, 358 U.S. 131 (1958)
358 U.S. 131 VAN NEWKIRK v. McNEILL, SUPERINTENDENT, MATTEAWAN STATE HOSPITAL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 258, Misc.
Decided December 8, 1958.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
