GIVENS v. WEST VIRGINIA, 358 U.S. 102 (1958)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

GIVENS v. WEST VIRGINIA, 358 U.S. 102 (1958)

358 U.S. 102

GIVENS v. WEST VIRGINIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 22, Misc.
Decided November 24, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

W. W. Barron, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Fred H. Caplan and George H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 358 U.S. 102, 103




U.S. Supreme Court

GIVENS v. WEST VIRGINIA, 358 U.S. 102 (1958)

358 U.S. 102

GIVENS v. WEST VIRGINIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 22, Misc.
Decided November 24, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

W. W. Barron, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Fred H. Caplan and George H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 358 U.S. 102, 103

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.