SHUTTLESWORTH v. BD. OF EDUCATION, 358 U.S. 101 (1958)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SHUTTLESWORTH v. BD. OF EDUCATION, 358 U.S. 101 (1958)

358 U.S. 101

SHUTTLESWORTH ET AL. v. BIRMINGHAM BOARD OF EDUCATION OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 341.
Decided November 24, 1958.

Judgment affirmed upon the limited grounds on which the District Court rested its decision.

Reported below: 162 F. Supp. 372.

James M. Nabrit, Jr., for appellants.

Ormond Somerville, Reid B. Barnes and Jos. F. Johnston for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed upon the limited grounds on which the District Court rested its decision. 162 F. Supp. 372, 384.

Page 358 U.S. 101, 102




U.S. Supreme Court

SHUTTLESWORTH v. BD. OF EDUCATION, 358 U.S. 101 (1958)

358 U.S. 101

SHUTTLESWORTH ET AL. v. BIRMINGHAM BOARD OF EDUCATION OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 341.
Decided November 24, 1958.

Judgment affirmed upon the limited grounds on which the District Court rested its decision.

Reported below: 162 F. Supp. 372.

James M. Nabrit, Jr., for appellants.

Ormond Somerville, Reid B. Barnes and Jos. F. Johnston for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed upon the limited grounds on which the District Court rested its decision. 162 F. Supp. 372, 384.

Page 358 U.S. 101, 102

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.