EAGLE LION STUDIOS, INC., v. LOEW'S INC., 358 U.S. 100 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

EAGLE LION STUDIOS, INC., v. LOEW'S INC., 358 U.S. 100 (1958)

358 U.S. 100

EAGLE LION STUDIOS, INC., ET AL. v. LOEW'S INC. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 17.
Argued November 10, 12, 1958.
Decided November 24, 1958.

248 F.2d 438, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

William L. McGovern argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Norman Diamond, Abe Krash and Seymour Krieger.

S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr. argued the cause for Loew's Incorporated, respondent. With him on the brief was Henry L. King.

Edward C. Raftery argued the cause for RKO Theatres, Inc., et al., respondents. With him on the brief was George A. Raftery.

Oscar H. Davis, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Henry Geller filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 358 U.S. 100, 101




U.S. Supreme Court

EAGLE LION STUDIOS, INC., v. LOEW'S INC., 358 U.S. 100 (1958)

358 U.S. 100

EAGLE LION STUDIOS, INC., ET AL. v. LOEW'S INC. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 17.
Argued November 10, 12, 1958.
Decided November 24, 1958.

248 F.2d 438, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

William L. McGovern argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Norman Diamond, Abe Krash and Seymour Krieger.

S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr. argued the cause for Loew's Incorporated, respondent. With him on the brief was Henry L. King.

Edward C. Raftery argued the cause for RKO Theatres, Inc., et al., respondents. With him on the brief was George A. Raftery.

Oscar H. Davis, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Henry Geller filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 358 U.S. 100, 101

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.