EAGLE LION STUDIOS, INC., v. LOEW'S INC., 358 U.S. 100 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
EAGLE LION STUDIOS, INC., v. LOEW'S INC., 358 U.S. 100 (1958)
358 U.S. 100 EAGLE LION STUDIOS, INC., ET AL. v. LOEW'S INC. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 17.
Argued November 10, 12, 1958.
Decided November 24, 1958.
248 F.2d 438, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
William L. McGovern argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Norman Diamond, Abe Krash and Seymour Krieger.
S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr. argued the cause for Loew's Incorporated, respondent. With him on the brief was Henry L. King.
Edward C. Raftery argued the cause for RKO Theatres, Inc., et al., respondents. With him on the brief was George A. Raftery.
Oscar H. Davis, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Henry Geller filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
EAGLE LION STUDIOS, INC., v. LOEW'S INC., 358 U.S. 100 (1958)
358 U.S. 100 EAGLE LION STUDIOS, INC., ET AL. v. LOEW'S INC. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 17.
Argued November 10, 12, 1958.
Decided November 24, 1958.
248 F.2d 438, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
William L. McGovern argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Norman Diamond, Abe Krash and Seymour Krieger.
S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr. argued the cause for Loew's Incorporated, respondent. With him on the brief was Henry L. King.
Edward C. Raftery argued the cause for RKO Theatres, Inc., et al., respondents. With him on the brief was George A. Raftery.
Oscar H. Davis, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Henry Geller filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Page 358 U.S. 100, 101
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
