URRUTIA v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 577 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

URRUTIA v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 577 (1958)

357 U.S. 577

URRUTIA v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 756, Misc.
Decided June 30, 1958.

Certiorari granted.

Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, judgment reversed and case remanded for hearing.

Reported below: 253 F.2d 501.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is reversed and the case is remanded for hearing.

Page 357 U.S. 577, 578




U.S. Supreme Court

URRUTIA v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 577 (1958)

357 U.S. 577

URRUTIA v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 756, Misc.
Decided June 30, 1958.

Certiorari granted.

Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, judgment reversed and case remanded for hearing.

Reported below: 253 F.2d 501.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is reversed and the case is remanded for hearing.

Page 357 U.S. 577, 578

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.