ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, 357 U.S. 575 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, 357 U.S. 575 (1958)

357 U.S. 575

ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 513, Misc.
Decided June 30, 1958.*

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and cases remanded for consideration in the light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214.

Reported below: No. 513, Misc., 51 Wash. 2d 893, 318 P.2d 975.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 596, Misc., Woods v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same Court.

Petitioners pro se.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Michael R. Alfieri, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 596, Misc.

PER CURIAM.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases are remanded for consideration in light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214.

Page 357 U.S. 575, 576




U.S. Supreme Court

ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, 357 U.S. 575 (1958)

357 U.S. 575

ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 513, Misc.
Decided June 30, 1958.*

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and cases remanded for consideration in the light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214.

Reported below: No. 513, Misc., 51 Wash. 2d 893, 318 P.2d 975.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 596, Misc., Woods v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same Court.

Petitioners pro se.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Michael R. Alfieri, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 596, Misc.

PER CURIAM.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases are remanded for consideration in light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214.

Page 357 U.S. 575, 576

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.