ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, 357 U.S. 575 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, 357 U.S. 575 (1958) 357 U.S. 575ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, SUPERINTENDENT,
WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
WASHINGTON.
No. 513, Misc.
Decided June 30, 1958.*
Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and cases remanded for consideration in the light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214.
Reported below: No. 513, Misc., 51 Wash. 2d 893, 318 P.2d 975.
[Footnote *] Together with No. 596, Misc., Woods v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same Court.
Petitioners pro se.
John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Michael R. Alfieri, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 596, Misc.
PER CURIAM.
The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases are remanded for consideration in light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214.
U.S. Supreme Court
ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, 357 U.S. 575 (1958) 357 U.S. 575 ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 513, Misc.
Decided June 30, 1958.*
Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and cases remanded for consideration in the light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214. Reported below: No. 513, Misc., 51 Wash. 2d 893, 318 P.2d 975. [Footnote *] Together with No. 596, Misc., Woods v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same Court. Petitioners pro se. John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Michael R. Alfieri, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 596, Misc. PER CURIAM. The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases are remanded for consideration in light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214. Page 357 U.S. 575, 576
