INDIVIGLIO v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 574 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

INDIVIGLIO v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 574 (1958)

357 U.S. 574

INDIVIGLIO ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 753.
Decided June 30, 1958.

Certiorari granted.

Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, judgment reversed on authority of cases cited.

Reported below: 249 F.2d 549.

Bernard A. Golding for petitioners.

Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is reversed. Jencks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657. See also Agnello v. United States, 269 U.S. 20, and Giordenello v. United States, ante, p. 480, decided this day.

Page 357 U.S. 574, 575

 


U.S. Supreme Court

INDIVIGLIO v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 574 (1958)

357 U.S. 574

INDIVIGLIO ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 753.
Decided June 30, 1958.

Certiorari granted.

Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, judgment reversed on authority of cases cited.

Reported below: 249 F.2d 549.

Bernard A. Golding for petitioners.

Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is reversed. Jencks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657. See also Agnello v. United States, 269 U.S. 20, and Giordenello v. United States, ante, p. 480, decided this day.

Page 357 U.S. 574, 575

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.