WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 348 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 348 (1958)

357 U.S. 348

WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1012.
Decided June 23, 1958.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed because of insufficiency of the evidence; and case remanded.

Reported below: 253 F.2d 913.

Daniel D. Glasser for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is reversed because of the insufficiency of the evidence and the case is remanded to that Court.

MR. JUSTICE BURTON, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER dissent.

Page 357 U.S. 348, 349




U.S. Supreme Court

WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 348 (1958)

357 U.S. 348

WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1012.
Decided June 23, 1958.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed because of insufficiency of the evidence; and case remanded.

Reported below: 253 F.2d 913.

Daniel D. Glasser for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is reversed because of the insufficiency of the evidence and the case is remanded to that Court.

MR. JUSTICE BURTON, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER dissent.

Page 357 U.S. 348, 349

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.