WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 348 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 348 (1958) 357 U.S. 348WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1012.
Decided June 23, 1958.
Certiorari granted; judgment reversed because of insufficiency of the evidence; and case remanded.
Reported below: 253 F.2d 913.
Daniel D. Glasser for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is reversed because of the insufficiency of the evidence and the case is remanded to that Court.
MR. JUSTICE BURTON, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER dissent.
U.S. Supreme Court
WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES, 357 U.S. 348 (1958) 357 U.S. 348 WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1012.
Decided June 23, 1958.
Certiorari granted; judgment reversed because of insufficiency of the evidence; and case remanded. Reported below: 253 F.2d 913. Daniel D. Glasser for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is reversed because of the insufficiency of the evidence and the case is remanded to that Court. MR. JUSTICE BURTON, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER dissent. Page 357 U.S. 348, 349
