DeFEBIO v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, 357 U.S. 218 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

DeFEBIO v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, 357 U.S. 218 (1958)

357 U.S. 218

DeFEBIO ET AL. v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF FAIRFAX COUNTY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 677, Misc.
Decided June 16, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 199 Va. 511, 100 S. E. 2d 760.

C. Douglas Adams, Jr. and Albert I. Kassabian for appellants.

A. S. Harrison, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, Kenneth C. Patty and R. D. McIlwaine, III, Assistant Attorneys General, and John C. Wood for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 357 U.S. 218, 219




U.S. Supreme Court

DeFEBIO v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, 357 U.S. 218 (1958)

357 U.S. 218

DeFEBIO ET AL. v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF FAIRFAX COUNTY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 677, Misc.
Decided June 16, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 199 Va. 511, 100 S. E. 2d 760.

C. Douglas Adams, Jr. and Albert I. Kassabian for appellants.

A. S. Harrison, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, Kenneth C. Patty and R. D. McIlwaine, III, Assistant Attorneys General, and John C. Wood for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 357 U.S. 218, 219

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.