HURLEY v. RAGEN, 356 U.S. 42 (1958)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

HURLEY v. RAGEN, 356 U.S. 42 (1958)

356 U.S. 42

HURLEY v. RAGEN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WILL COUNTY,
ILLINOIS. No. 225, Misc.
Decided March 17, 1958.

Certiorari denied without consideration of questions raised and without prejudice to institution of proceedings in an Illinois state court under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act of August 4, 1949.

Petitioner pro se.

Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied without consideration of the questions raised therein and without prejudice to the institution by petitioner of proceedings in any Illinois state court of competent jurisdiction under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act of August 4, 1949. Ill. Rev. Stat., 1957, c. 38, 826.

Page 356 U.S. 42, 43




U.S. Supreme Court

HURLEY v. RAGEN, 356 U.S. 42 (1958)

356 U.S. 42

HURLEY v. RAGEN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WILL COUNTY,
ILLINOIS. No. 225, Misc.
Decided March 17, 1958.

Certiorari denied without consideration of questions raised and without prejudice to institution of proceedings in an Illinois state court under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act of August 4, 1949.

Petitioner pro se.

Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied without consideration of the questions raised therein and without prejudice to the institution by petitioner of proceedings in any Illinois state court of competent jurisdiction under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act of August 4, 1949. Ill. Rev. Stat., 1957, c. 38, 826.

Page 356 U.S. 42, 43

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.