HURLEY v. RAGEN, 356 U.S. 42 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
HURLEY v. RAGEN, 356 U.S. 42 (1958) 356 U.S. 42HURLEY v. RAGEN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WILL
COUNTY,
ILLINOIS. No. 225, Misc.
Decided March 17, 1958.
Certiorari denied without consideration of questions raised and without prejudice to institution of proceedings in an Illinois state court under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act of August 4, 1949.
Petitioner pro se.
Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied without consideration of the questions raised therein and without prejudice to the institution by petitioner of proceedings in any Illinois state court of competent jurisdiction under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act of August 4, 1949. Ill. Rev. Stat., 1957, c. 38, 826.
U.S. Supreme Court
HURLEY v. RAGEN, 356 U.S. 42 (1958) 356 U.S. 42 HURLEY v. RAGEN, WARDEN.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WILL COUNTY,
ILLINOIS. No. 225, Misc.
Decided March 17, 1958.
Certiorari denied without consideration of questions raised and without prejudice to institution of proceedings in an Illinois state court under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act of August 4, 1949. Petitioner pro se. Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied without consideration of the questions raised therein and without prejudice to the institution by petitioner of proceedings in any Illinois state court of competent jurisdiction under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act of August 4, 1949. Ill. Rev. Stat., 1957, c. 38, 826. Page 356 U.S. 42, 43
