PHILYAW v. ARKANSAS, 356 U.S. 340 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
PHILYAW v. ARKANSAS, 356 U.S. 340 (1958) 356 U.S. 340 PHILYAW v. ARKANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS.
No. 821.
Decided April 28, 1958.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 228 Ark. 71, 305 S.W.2d 851.
George F. Edwardes for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
CAINE v. CALIFORNIA, 356 U.S. 340 (1958) 356 U.S. 340 CAINE v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
SAN MATEO COUNTY. No. 826.
Decided April 28, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
A. Noble McCartney for appellant.
Eugene K. Kennedy for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
PHILYAW v. ARKANSAS, 356 U.S. 340 (1958) 356 U.S. 340 PHILYAW v. ARKANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS.
No. 821.
Decided April 28, 1958.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 228 Ark. 71, 305 S.W.2d 851.
George F. Edwardes for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
CAINE v. CALIFORNIA, 356 U.S. 340 (1958) 356 U.S. 340 CAINE v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
SAN MATEO COUNTY. No. 826.
Decided April 28, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
A. Noble McCartney for appellant.
Eugene K. Kennedy for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 356 U.S. 340, 341
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.