UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND, 356 U.S. 257 (1958)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND, 356 U.S. 257 (1958)

356 U.S. 257

UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND, ALIAS DUMANUS, THORNSON AND SLATER, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 771.
Decided April 7, 1958.

Certiorari granted and judgment affirmed.

Reported below: 255 F.2d 749.

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.

Robert L. Brock for David Diamond, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 356 U.S. 257, 258

 


U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND, 356 U.S. 257 (1958)

356 U.S. 257

UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND, ALIAS DUMANUS, THORNSON AND SLATER, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 771.
Decided April 7, 1958.

Certiorari granted and judgment affirmed.

Reported below: 255 F.2d 749.

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.

Robert L. Brock for David Diamond, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 356 U.S. 257, 258

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.