MARSHALL v. BRUCKER, 356 U.S. 24 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

MARSHALL v. BRUCKER, 356 U.S. 24 (1958)

356 U.S. 24

MARSHALL v. BRUCKER, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 41, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1958.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed; and case remanded to District Court for appropriate relief in the light of Harmon v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579.

Reported below: 100 U.S. App. D.C. 256, 243 F.2d 834.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for appropriate relief in the light of Harmon v. Brucker and Abramowitz v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579, decided March 3, 1958.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in these cases.

Page 356 U.S. 24, 25




U.S. Supreme Court

MARSHALL v. BRUCKER, 356 U.S. 24 (1958)

356 U.S. 24

MARSHALL v. BRUCKER, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 41, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1958.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed; and case remanded to District Court for appropriate relief in the light of Harmon v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579.

Reported below: 100 U.S. App. D.C. 256, 243 F.2d 834.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for appropriate relief in the light of Harmon v. Brucker and Abramowitz v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579, decided March 3, 1958.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in these cases.

Page 356 U.S. 24, 25

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.