MARSHALL v. BRUCKER, 356 U.S. 24 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
MARSHALL v. BRUCKER, 356 U.S. 24 (1958) 356 U.S. 24MARSHALL v. BRUCKER, SECRETARY OF THE
ARMY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 41, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1958.
Certiorari granted; judgment reversed; and case remanded to District Court for appropriate relief in the light of Harmon v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579.
Reported below: 100 U.S. App. D.C. 256, 243 F.2d 834.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Rankin for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for appropriate relief in the light of Harmon v. Brucker and Abramowitz v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579, decided March 3, 1958.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in these cases.
U.S. Supreme Court
MARSHALL v. BRUCKER, 356 U.S. 24 (1958) 356 U.S. 24 MARSHALL v. BRUCKER, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 41, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1958.
Certiorari granted; judgment reversed; and case remanded to District Court for appropriate relief in the light of Harmon v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579. Reported below: 100 U.S. App. D.C. 256, 243 F.2d 834. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for appropriate relief in the light of Harmon v. Brucker and Abramowitz v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579, decided March 3, 1958. MR. JUSTICE CLARK dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in these cases. Page 356 U.S. 24, 25
