PRATT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 356 U.S. 226 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

PRATT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 356 U.S. 226 (1958) 356 U.S. 226

PRATT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 455, Misc.
Decided March 31, 1958.

Appeal dismissed.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

STRONG v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/356/226/">356 U.S. 226</a> (1958) 356 U.S. 226 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STRONG v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 226 (1958) 356 U.S. 226

STRONG v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 456, Misc.
Decided March 31, 1958.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: 155 F. Supp. 468.

James F. Connolly for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Paul A. Sweeney and Herman Marcuse for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 356 U.S. 226, 227

 


U.S. Supreme Court

PRATT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 356 U.S. 226 (1958) 356 U.S. 226

PRATT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 455, Misc.
Decided March 31, 1958.

Appeal dismissed.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

STRONG v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/356/226/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/356/226/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/356/226/">356 U.S. 226</a></a></a> (1958) 356 U.S. 226 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STRONG v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 226 (1958) 356 U.S. 226

STRONG v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 456, Misc.
Decided March 31, 1958.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: 155 F. Supp. 468.

James F. Connolly for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Paul A. Sweeney and Herman Marcuse for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 356 U.S. 226, 227

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.