TURNER v. WRIGHT, 355 U.S. 65 (1957)

U.S. Supreme Court

TURNER v. WRIGHT, 355 U.S. 65 (1957)

355 U.S. 65

TURNER v. WRIGHT, TREASURER OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 405.
Decided November 18, 1957.*

Appeals dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: No. 405, 11 Ill. 2d 161, 142 N. E. 2d 84; No. 470, 11 Ill. 2d 337, 142 N. E. 2d 691; No. 482, 11 Ill. 2d 294, 142 N. E. 2d 46.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 470, Abbate Brothers, Inc., et al. v. City of Chicago, and No. 482, Burgess-Norton Manufacturing Co. v. Lyons et al., also on appeals from the same court.

Amos M. Matthews for appellant in No. 405.

Melvin B. Lewis for appellants in No. 470.

E. H. McDermott and Richard S. Oldberg for appellant in No. 482.

Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, and Mark O. Roberts, Lee D. Martin and Willard Ice, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees in Nos. 405 and 482.

John C. Melaniphy and Sydney R. Drebin for appellee in No. 470.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 65, 66




U.S. Supreme Court

TURNER v. WRIGHT, 355 U.S. 65 (1957)

355 U.S. 65

TURNER v. WRIGHT, TREASURER OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 405.
Decided November 18, 1957.*

Appeals dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: No. 405, 11 Ill. 2d 161, 142 N. E. 2d 84; No. 470, 11 Ill. 2d 337, 142 N. E. 2d 691; No. 482, 11 Ill. 2d 294, 142 N. E. 2d 46.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 470, Abbate Brothers, Inc., et al. v. City of Chicago, and No. 482, Burgess-Norton Manufacturing Co. v. Lyons et al., also on appeals from the same court.

Amos M. Matthews for appellant in No. 405.

Melvin B. Lewis for appellants in No. 470.

E. H. McDermott and Richard S. Oldberg for appellant in No. 482.

Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, and Mark O. Roberts, Lee D. Martin and Willard Ice, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees in Nos. 405 and 482.

John C. Melaniphy and Sydney R. Drebin for appellee in No. 470.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 65, 66

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.