THILLENS, INC., v. MOREY, 355 U.S. 606 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

THILLENS, INC., v. MOREY, 355 U.S. 606 (1958)

355 U.S. 606

THILLENS, INC., v. MOREY, AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 696.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 11 Ill. 2d 579, 144 N. E. 2d 735.

Henry F. Tenney, David Jacker and Perry S. Patterson for appellant.

Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines and Ben Schwartz, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Auditor of Public Accounts of Illinois et al., and Charles H. Thompson and Hirsch E. Soble for Arnold et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ROWLAND v. TEXAS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/355/606/case.html">355 U.S. 606</a> (1958) 355 U.S. 606 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ROWLAND v. TEXAS, 355 U.S. 606 (1958)

355 U.S. 606

ROWLAND v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 709.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 165 Tex. Cr. R. ___, 311 S. W. 2d 831.

Dorsey B. Hardeman for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 355 U.S. 606, 607




U.S. Supreme Court

THILLENS, INC., v. MOREY, 355 U.S. 606 (1958)

355 U.S. 606

THILLENS, INC., v. MOREY, AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 696.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 11 Ill. 2d 579, 144 N. E. 2d 735.

Henry F. Tenney, David Jacker and Perry S. Patterson for appellant.

Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines and Ben Schwartz, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Auditor of Public Accounts of Illinois et al., and Charles H. Thompson and Hirsch E. Soble for Arnold et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ROWLAND v. TEXAS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/355/606/case.html">355 U.S. 606</a> (1958) 355 U.S. 606 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ROWLAND v. TEXAS, 355 U.S. 606 (1958)

355 U.S. 606

ROWLAND v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 709.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 165 Tex. Cr. R. ___, 311 S. W. 2d 831.

Dorsey B. Hardeman for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 355 U.S. 606, 607

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.