TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY, 355 U.S. 603 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY, 355 U.S. 603 (1958)
355 U.S. 603 TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMERICAN PRODUCTION CO. ET AL. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY,
TEXAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. No. 574.
Decided March 3, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 157 Tex. ___, 303 S. W. 2d 780.
Francis G. Coates for appellants.
Dow H. Heard for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN, 355 U.S. 603 (1958)
355 U.S. 603 OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF
ACCOUNTANCY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 623.
Decided March 3, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 96 So.2d 139.
Edward McCarthy and Elliott Adams for appellant.
Charles E. Pledger, Jr., Justin L. Edgerton and L. William Graham for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY, 355 U.S. 603 (1958)
355 U.S. 603 TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMERICAN PRODUCTION CO. ET AL. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY,
TEXAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. No. 574.
Decided March 3, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 157 Tex. ___, 303 S. W. 2d 780.
Francis G. Coates for appellants.
Dow H. Heard for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN, 355 U.S. 603 (1958)
355 U.S. 603 OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF
ACCOUNTANCY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 623.
Decided March 3, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 96 So.2d 139.
Edward McCarthy and Elliott Adams for appellant.
Charles E. Pledger, Jr., Justin L. Edgerton and L. William Graham for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
