SPEVACK v. STRAUSS, 355 U.S. 601 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

SPEVACK v. STRAUSS, 355 U.S. 601 (1958)

355 U.S. 601

SPEVACK v. STRAUSS ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 641.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Certiorari granted; judgment and orders of Court of Appeals vacated; and case remanded to that Court with instructions (1) to allow petitioner's proposed amendments to complaint, and (2) to determine, in light of amended complaint, the issues raised by petitioner's appeal.

Reported below: 101 U.S. App. D.C. 339, 248 F.2d 752.

Carleton U. Edwards, II, Joseph Y. Houghton and Bernard Margolius for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, E. Riley Casey and Roland A. Anderson for respondents.

Briefs of amici curiae in support of the petition for a writ of certiorari were filed by Elisha Hanson, Arthur B. Hanson and Calvin H. Cobb, Jr. for the American Chemical Society, and Carlton S. Dargusch for the Engineers Joint Council.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals, and the orders of the Court of Appeals denying petitioner's motion for leave to amend the complaint and petition for rehearing, are vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions (1) to allow petitioner's proposed amendments to the complaint and (2) to determine, in light of the amended complaint, the issues raised by petitioner's appeal.

Page 355 U.S. 601, 602




U.S. Supreme Court

SPEVACK v. STRAUSS, 355 U.S. 601 (1958)

355 U.S. 601

SPEVACK v. STRAUSS ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 641.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Certiorari granted; judgment and orders of Court of Appeals vacated; and case remanded to that Court with instructions (1) to allow petitioner's proposed amendments to complaint, and (2) to determine, in light of amended complaint, the issues raised by petitioner's appeal.

Reported below: 101 U.S. App. D.C. 339, 248 F.2d 752.

Carleton U. Edwards, II, Joseph Y. Houghton and Bernard Margolius for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, E. Riley Casey and Roland A. Anderson for respondents.

Briefs of amici curiae in support of the petition for a writ of certiorari were filed by Elisha Hanson, Arthur B. Hanson and Calvin H. Cobb, Jr. for the American Chemical Society, and Carlton S. Dargusch for the Engineers Joint Council.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals, and the orders of the Court of Appeals denying petitioner's motion for leave to amend the complaint and petition for rehearing, are vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions (1) to allow petitioner's proposed amendments to the complaint and (2) to determine, in light of the amended complaint, the issues raised by petitioner's appeal.

Page 355 U.S. 601, 602

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.