AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN R.R. v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS, 355 U.S. 6 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court
AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN R.R. v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS, 355 U.S. 6 (1957)
355 U.S. 6 AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS.
No. 258.Decided October 14, 1957.*
148 F. Supp. 399, affirmed.
[Footnote *] Together with No. 263, American Trucking Associations, Inc., v. Frozen Food Express, and No. 270, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Frozen Food Express et al., also on appeals from the same court.
Carl Helmetag, Jr. and Charles P. Reynolds for appellants in No. 258.
Rollo E. Kidwell and Peter T. Beardsley for appellant in No. 263.
Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns, Jr. for appellant in No. 270.
Carl L. Phinney for the Frozen Food Express, appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN R.R. v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS, 355 U.S. 6 (1957)
355 U.S. 6 AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS.
No. 258.Decided October 14, 1957.*
148 F. Supp. 399, affirmed.
[Footnote *] Together with No. 263, American Trucking Associations, Inc., v. Frozen Food Express, and No. 270, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Frozen Food Express et al., also on appeals from the same court.
Carl Helmetag, Jr. and Charles P. Reynolds for appellants in No. 258.
Rollo E. Kidwell and Peter T. Beardsley for appellant in No. 263.
Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns, Jr. for appellant in No. 270.
Carl L. Phinney for the Frozen Food Express, appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Page 355 U.S. 6, 7
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
