AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN R.R. v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS, 355 U.S. 6 (1957)

U.S. Supreme Court

AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN R.R. v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS, 355 U.S. 6 (1957)

355 U.S. 6

AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

TEXAS.

No. 258.
Decided October 14, 1957.*

148 F. Supp. 399, affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 263, American Trucking Associations, Inc., v. Frozen Food Express, and No. 270, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Frozen Food Express et al., also on appeals from the same court.

Carl Helmetag, Jr. and Charles P. Reynolds for appellants in No. 258.

Rollo E. Kidwell and Peter T. Beardsley for appellant in No. 263.

Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns, Jr. for appellant in No. 270.

Carl L. Phinney for the Frozen Food Express, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 355 U.S. 6, 7




U.S. Supreme Court

AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN R.R. v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS, 355 U.S. 6 (1957)

355 U.S. 6

AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

TEXAS.

No. 258.
Decided October 14, 1957.*

148 F. Supp. 399, affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 263, American Trucking Associations, Inc., v. Frozen Food Express, and No. 270, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Frozen Food Express et al., also on appeals from the same court.

Carl Helmetag, Jr. and Charles P. Reynolds for appellants in No. 258.

Rollo E. Kidwell and Peter T. Beardsley for appellant in No. 263.

Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns, Jr. for appellant in No. 270.

Carl L. Phinney for the Frozen Food Express, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 355 U.S. 6, 7

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.