Honeycutt v. Wabash Ry. Co., 355 U.S. 424 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

Honeycutt v. Wabash Ry. Co., 355 U.S. 424 (1958)

Honeycutt v. Wabash Railway Co.

No. 639

Decided January 27, 1958

355 U.S. 424

Syllabus

In this case arising under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, held: the proofs justified the conclusion that employer negligence played a part in producing petitioner's injury. Therefore, certiorari is granted, the judgment reversing a judgment for petitioner is reversed, and the case is remanded.

303 S.W.2d 153 reversed and remanded.

U.S. Supreme Court

Honeycutt v. Wabash Ry. Co., 355 U.S. 424 (1958)

Honeycutt v. Wabash Railway Co.

No. 639

Decided January 27, 1958

355 U.S. 424

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE

ST. LOUIS COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI

Syllabus

In this case arising under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, held: the proofs justified the conclusion that employer negligence played a part in producing petitioner's injury. Therefore, certiorari is granted, the judgment reversing a judgment for petitioner is reversed, and the case is remanded.

303 S.W.2d 153 reversed and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari is granted, and the judgment of the St. Louis Court of Appeals of the State of Missouri is reversed and the case is remanded for proceedings in conformity with this opinion. We hold that the proofs justified with reason the jury's conclusion that employer negligence played a part in producing the petitioner's injury. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 352 U. S. 521; Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, with whom MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER joins, concurs in the result for the reasons given in his memorandum in Gibson v. Thompson, 355 U. S. 18. For the reasons set forth in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 352 U. S. 524, MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER is of the view that the writ of certiorari is improvidently granted.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.