KARADZOLE v. ARTUKOVIC, 355 U.S. 393 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

KARADZOLE v. ARTUKOVIC, 355 U.S. 393 (1958)

355 U.S. 393

KARADZOLE, CONSUL GENERAL OF FEDERAL PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA,
ET AL. v. ARTUKOVIC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 462.
Decided January 20, 1958.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded to the District Court for discharge of the writ of habeas corpus and the remand of respondent to the custody of the United States Marshal, in order that a hearing be held under 18 U.S.C. 3184.

Reported below: 247 F.2d 198.

Lawrence S. Lesser and George E. Danielson for petitioners.

Solicitor General Rankin filed a memorandum for the United States.

Robert T. Reynolds for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for the discharge of the writ of habeas corpus and the remand of respondent to the custody of the United States Marshal in order that a hearing be held under 18 U.S.C. 3184.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissent.

Page 355 U.S. 393, 394




U.S. Supreme Court

KARADZOLE v. ARTUKOVIC, 355 U.S. 393 (1958)

355 U.S. 393

KARADZOLE, CONSUL GENERAL OF FEDERAL PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA,
ET AL. v. ARTUKOVIC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 462.
Decided January 20, 1958.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded to the District Court for discharge of the writ of habeas corpus and the remand of respondent to the custody of the United States Marshal, in order that a hearing be held under 18 U.S.C. 3184.

Reported below: 247 F.2d 198.

Lawrence S. Lesser and George E. Danielson for petitioners.

Solicitor General Rankin filed a memorandum for the United States.

Robert T. Reynolds for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for the discharge of the writ of habeas corpus and the remand of respondent to the custody of the United States Marshal in order that a hearing be held under 18 U.S.C. 3184.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissent.

Page 355 U.S. 393, 394

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.