ZAVADA v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 392 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

ZAVADA v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 392 (1958)

355 U.S. 392

ZAVADA v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 65, Misc.
Decided January 20, 1958.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed; and case remanded to the District Court for a hearing.

Reported below: 245 F.2d 956.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Warren Olney, III, then Assistant Attorney General, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for a hearing. Walker v. Johnston, 312 U.S. 275; Holiday v. Johnston, 313 U.S. 342.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER dissent.

Page 355 U.S. 392, 393

 


U.S. Supreme Court

ZAVADA v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 392 (1958)

355 U.S. 392

ZAVADA v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 65, Misc.
Decided January 20, 1958.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed; and case remanded to the District Court for a hearing.

Reported below: 245 F.2d 956.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Warren Olney, III, then Assistant Attorney General, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for a hearing. Walker v. Johnston, 312 U.S. 275; Holiday v. Johnston, 313 U.S. 342.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER dissent.

Page 355 U.S. 392, 393

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.