FORD v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 38 (1957)

U.S. Supreme Court

FORD v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 38 (1957)

355 U.S. 38

FORD v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 82.
Decided November 12, 1957.

Upon suggestion of mootness, judgment vacated and case remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate the judgment of conviction and dismiss the indictment.

Reported below: 237 F.2d 57.

Sydney R. Rubin for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the suggestion of mootness the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court with directions to vacate the judgment of conviction and to dismiss the indictment.

Page 355 U.S. 38, 39




U.S. Supreme Court

FORD v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 38 (1957)

355 U.S. 38

FORD v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 82.
Decided November 12, 1957.

Upon suggestion of mootness, judgment vacated and case remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate the judgment of conviction and dismiss the indictment.

Reported below: 237 F.2d 57.

Sydney R. Rubin for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the suggestion of mootness the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court with directions to vacate the judgment of conviction and to dismiss the indictment.

Page 355 U.S. 38, 39

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.