BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS, 355 U.S. 281 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS, 355 U.S. 281 (1958)

355 U.S. 281

BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 39.
Argued November 19, 1957.
Decided January 6, 1958.

 7 Ill. 2d 138, 130 N.E.2d 187, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Walter T. Fisher, acting under appointment by the Court, 352 U.S. 958, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Latham Castle, Attorney General, and Theodore G. Maheras, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 355 U.S. 281, 282

 


U.S. Supreme Court

BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS, 355 U.S. 281 (1958)

355 U.S. 281

BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 39.
Argued November 19, 1957.
Decided January 6, 1958.

 7 Ill. 2d 138, 130 N.E.2d 187, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Walter T. Fisher, acting under appointment by the Court, 352 U.S. 958, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Latham Castle, Attorney General, and Theodore G. Maheras, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 355 U.S. 281, 282

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.