ROSENGARD v. CITY OF BOSTON, 355 U.S. 272 (1957)

U.S. Supreme Court

ROSENGARD v. CITY OF BOSTON, 355 U.S. 272 (1957)

355 U.S. 272

ROSENGARD ET AL. v. CITY OF BOSTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 566.
Decided December 16, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 336 Mass. 224, 143 N. E. 2d 683.

Samuel P. Sears for appellants.

J. Edward Keefe, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 272, 273




U.S. Supreme Court

ROSENGARD v. CITY OF BOSTON, 355 U.S. 272 (1957)

355 U.S. 272

ROSENGARD ET AL. v. CITY OF BOSTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 566.
Decided December 16, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 336 Mass. 224, 143 N. E. 2d 683.

Samuel P. Sears for appellants.

J. Edward Keefe, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 272, 273

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.