LITHUANIAN WORKERS v. BROWNELL, 355 U.S. 23 (1957)

U.S. Supreme Court

LITHUANIAN WORKERS v. BROWNELL, 355 U.S. 23 (1957)

355 U.S. 23

ASSOCIATION OF LITHUANIAN WORKERS ET AL. v. BROWNELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 295.
Decided October 28, 1957.

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and causes remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the proceedings as moot.

Reported below: 101 U.S. App. D.C. 73, 247 F.2d 64.

Joseph Forer and David Rein for petitioners. Nathan Witt for Association of Lithuanian Workers, petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Paul A. Sweeney and B. Jenkins Middleton for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments are vacated and the causes are remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the proceedings as moot.

Page 355 U.S. 23, 24

 


U.S. Supreme Court

LITHUANIAN WORKERS v. BROWNELL, 355 U.S. 23 (1957)

355 U.S. 23

ASSOCIATION OF LITHUANIAN WORKERS ET AL. v. BROWNELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 295.
Decided October 28, 1957.

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and causes remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the proceedings as moot.

Reported below: 101 U.S. App. D.C. 73, 247 F.2d 64.

Joseph Forer and David Rein for petitioners. Nathan Witt for Association of Lithuanian Workers, petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Paul A. Sweeney and B. Jenkins Middleton for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments are vacated and the causes are remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the proceedings as moot.

Page 355 U.S. 23, 24

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.