MOUNCE v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 180 (1957)

U.S. Supreme Court

MOUNCE v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 180 (1957)

355 U.S. 180

MOUNCE v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 542.
Decided December 9, 1957.

Upon consideration of the record and confession of error by the Solicitor General, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for consideration in the light of Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476.

Reported below: 247 F.2d 148.

O. John Rogge for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Upon consideration of the entire record and confession of error by the Solicitor General the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for consideration in light of Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476.

Page 355 U.S. 180, 181

 


U.S. Supreme Court

MOUNCE v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 180 (1957)

355 U.S. 180

MOUNCE v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 542.
Decided December 9, 1957.

Upon consideration of the record and confession of error by the Solicitor General, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for consideration in the light of Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476.

Reported below: 247 F.2d 148.

O. John Rogge for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Upon consideration of the entire record and confession of error by the Solicitor General the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for consideration in light of Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476.

Page 355 U.S. 180, 181

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.