A., T. & S. F. R. CO. v. DIXIE CARRIERS, 355 U.S. 179 (1957)

U.S. Supreme Court

A., T. & S. F. R. CO. v. DIXIE CARRIERS, 355 U.S. 179 (1957)

355 U.S. 179

ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. DIXIE CARRIERS, INC.,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

TEXAS.

 No. 60.
Decided December 9, 1957.*

Upon suggestion of mootness, judgment vacated and case remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.

Reported below: 143 F. Supp. 844.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 61, United States v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., et al., and No. 62, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., et al., also on appeal from the same Court.

Robert H. Bierma, Richard J. Murphy and Harvey Huston for the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., appellants in No. 60.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States, appellant in No. 61, and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellant in No. 62.

Donald Macleay, Harry C. Ames, Harry C. Ames, Jr., Nuel D. Belnap, T. S. Christopher and John C. Ridley for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the suggestion of mootness the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas is vacated and the case is remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.

Page 355 U.S. 179, 180




U.S. Supreme Court

A., T. & S. F. R. CO. v. DIXIE CARRIERS, 355 U.S. 179 (1957)

355 U.S. 179

ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. DIXIE CARRIERS, INC.,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

TEXAS.

 No. 60.
Decided December 9, 1957.*

Upon suggestion of mootness, judgment vacated and case remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.

Reported below: 143 F. Supp. 844.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 61, United States v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., et al., and No. 62, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., et al., also on appeal from the same Court.

Robert H. Bierma, Richard J. Murphy and Harvey Huston for the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., appellants in No. 60.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States, appellant in No. 61, and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellant in No. 62.

Donald Macleay, Harry C. Ames, Harry C. Ames, Jr., Nuel D. Belnap, T. S. Christopher and John C. Ridley for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the suggestion of mootness the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas is vacated and the case is remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.

Page 355 U.S. 179, 180

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.