FOUR MAPLE DRIVE REALTY CORP. v. ABRAMS, 355 U.S. 14 (1957)

U.S. Supreme Court

FOUR MAPLE DRIVE REALTY CORP. v. ABRAMS, 355 U.S. 14 (1957)

355 U.S. 14

FOUR MAPLE DRIVE REALTY CORP. v. ABRAMS, NEW YORK STATE RENT
ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 181.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 2 N. Y. 2d 837, 140 N. E. 2d 870.

Edward Margolin and Herbert M. Balin for appellant.

Nathan Heller for the New York State Rent Administrator, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


WATSON v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/355/14/case.html">355 U.S. 14</a> (1957) 355 U.S. 14 (1957) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WATSON v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 14 (1957)

355 U.S. 14

WATSON v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS.
No. 161.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated and case remanded for consideration in the light of Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363.

Reported below: 137 Ct. Cl. 557.

Rees B. Gillespie for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Claims is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363.

Page 355 U.S. 14, 15




U.S. Supreme Court

FOUR MAPLE DRIVE REALTY CORP. v. ABRAMS, 355 U.S. 14 (1957)

355 U.S. 14

FOUR MAPLE DRIVE REALTY CORP. v. ABRAMS, NEW YORK STATE RENT
ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 181.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 2 N. Y. 2d 837, 140 N. E. 2d 870.

Edward Margolin and Herbert M. Balin for appellant.

Nathan Heller for the New York State Rent Administrator, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


WATSON v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/355/14/case.html">355 U.S. 14</a> (1957) 355 U.S. 14 (1957) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WATSON v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 14 (1957)

355 U.S. 14

WATSON v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS.
No. 161.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated and case remanded for consideration in the light of Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363.

Reported below: 137 Ct. Cl. 557.

Rees B. Gillespie for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Claims is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363.

Page 355 U.S. 14, 15

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.