GIBRALTAR FACTORS CORP. v. SLAPO, 355 U.S. 13 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court
GIBRALTAR FACTORS CORP. v. SLAPO, 355 U.S. 13 (1957) 355 U.S. 13 GIBRALTAR FACTORS CORP. v. SLAPO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 278.
Decided October 14, 1957.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 23 N. J. 459, 129 A.2d 567.
George H. Rosenstein for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMM. v. PREMIER PEAT MOSS CORP., 355 U.S. 13 (1957) 355 U.S. 13 INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. PREMIER PEAT MOSS CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 148.
Decided October 14, 1957.*
147 F. Supp. 169, affirmed.
[Footnote *] Together with No. 149, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Premier Peat Moss Corp. et al., on appeal from the same court.
Robert W. Ginnane and B. Franklin Taylor, Jr. for appellant in No. 148.
Carl Helmetag, Jr. for appellants in No. 149.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
GIBRALTAR FACTORS CORP. v. SLAPO, 355 U.S. 13 (1957) 355 U.S. 13 GIBRALTAR FACTORS CORP. v. SLAPO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 278.
Decided October 14, 1957.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 23 N. J. 459, 129 A.2d 567.
George H. Rosenstein for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMM. v. PREMIER PEAT MOSS CORP., 355 U.S. 13 (1957) 355 U.S. 13 INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. PREMIER PEAT MOSS CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 148.
Decided October 14, 1957.*
147 F. Supp. 169, affirmed.
[Footnote *] Together with No. 149, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Premier Peat Moss Corp. et al., on appeal from the same court.
Robert W. Ginnane and B. Franklin Taylor, Jr. for appellant in No. 148.
Carl Helmetag, Jr. for appellants in No. 149.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Page 355 U.S. 13, 14
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
