LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES v. BARR, 355 U.S. 12 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court
LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES v. BARR, 355 U.S. 12 (1957)
355 U.S. 12 LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES v. BARR ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS SWIM FOR
HEALTH ASSOCIATION.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 128.
Decided October 14, 1957.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 1 N. Y. 2d 413, 135 N. E. 2d 801.
Max Freund for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY, 355 U.S. 12 (1957)
355 U.S. 12COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY (FORMERLY C. B. COTTRELL & SONS CO.) ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE.
No. 316.
Decided October 14, 1957.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: ___ Del. ___, 128 A. 2d 225.
Edward J. Ennis for appellant.
Henry M. Canby for the Pawcatuck Company et al. and David F. Anderson for the Harris-Seybold Company et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES v. BARR, 355 U.S. 12 (1957)
355 U.S. 12 LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES v. BARR ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS SWIM FOR
HEALTH ASSOCIATION.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 128.
Decided October 14, 1957.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 1 N. Y. 2d 413, 135 N. E. 2d 801.
Max Freund for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY, 355 U.S. 12 (1957)
355 U.S. 12COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY (FORMERLY C. B. COTTRELL & SONS CO.) ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE.
No. 316.
Decided October 14, 1957.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: ___ Del. ___, 128 A. 2d 225.
Edward J. Ennis for appellant.
Henry M. Canby for the Pawcatuck Company et al. and David F. Anderson for the Harris-Seybold Company et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
