CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD, 352 U.S. 995 (1957)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD , 352 U.S. 995 (1957)

352 U.S. 995

CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, LOCAL LODGE NO. 721, et al.
No. 84.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 25, 1957

Mr. John B. Miller, for petitioner.

Messrs. Benning M. Grice and Wayland K. Sullivan, for respondents.

On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the suggestion of mootness the writ is dismissed on the ground that the cause is moot.[ Central of Ga. Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen 352 U.S. 995 (1957) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD , 352 U.S. 995 (1957)

352 U.S. 995

CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, LOCAL LODGE NO. 721, et al.
No. 84.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 25, 1957

Mr. John B. Miller, for petitioner.

Messrs. Benning M. Grice and Wayland K. Sullivan, for respondents.

On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the suggestion of mootness the writ is dismissed on the ground that the cause is moot.[ Central of Ga. Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen 352 U.S. 995 (1957) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.