LESLIE v. HOUSTON NATURAL GAS CORP., 352 U.S. 803 (1956)

U.S. Supreme Court

LESLIE v. HOUSTON NATURAL GAS CORP., 352 U.S. 803

352 U.S. 803

LESLIE et al.
v.
HOUSTON NATURAL GAS CORP.
No. 146.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 4, 1956

Messrs. Fred W. Moore and Dan Moody, for petitioners.

Mr. Leon Jaworski (Messrs. John C. White and Milton K. Eckert, on the brief), for respondent.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas.

B. H. Gillman, George d. Gibson, C. L. Lambert, L. E. Dykes, D. C. Landwehr, L. B. Wolfe, Harry Pepper, Standard Rendering Co., John G. Taylor, A. M. Lewis and A. N. Lewis as partners, and S. J. Cutaia and Frank Cutaia as partners, J. E. Burleson and George L. Barr are dismissed as parties petitioner herein per stipulation pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court. 28 U.S.C.A.


U.S. Supreme Court

LESLIE v. HOUSTON NATURAL GAS CORP., 352 U.S. 803

 352 U.S. 803

LESLIE et al.
v.
HOUSTON NATURAL GAS CORP.
No. 146.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 4, 1956

Messrs. Fred W. Moore and Dan Moody, for petitioners.

Mr. Leon Jaworski (Messrs. John C. White and Milton K. Eckert, on the brief), for respondent.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas.

B. H. Gillman, George d. Gibson, C. L. Lambert, L. E. Dykes, D. C. Landwehr, L. B. Wolfe, Harry Pepper, Standard Rendering Co., John G. Taylor, A. M. Lewis and A. N. Lewis as partners, and S. J. Cutaia and Frank Cutaia as partners, J. E. Burleson and George L. Barr are dismissed as parties petitioner herein per stipulation pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court. 28 U.S.C.A.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.