Since a majority of the Justices participating do not find
ground for disbarment, as required by Rule 8 of the present Rules
of this Court, the order of disbarment, 345 U.
, is set aside, and the rule to show cause is
April 6, 1953, an order was entered disbarring Isserman from the
practice of law in this Court pursuant to Rule 2, par. 5, of this
Court's Rules then in effect. See In re Isserman,
345 U. S. 286
order of disbarment is now before us on a petition for rehearing.
Rule 8 of our present Rules provides that "no order of disbarment
will be entered except with the concurrence of a majority of the
justices participating." The petition for rehearing is granted. A
majority of the Justices participating do not find ground for
disbarment of Isserman. Accordingly, the former order of disbarment
is set aside, and the rule against Isserman to show cause is
MR. JUSTICE BURTON, with whom MR. JUSTICE REED and MR. JUSTICE
MINTON join, dissents for the reasons
Page 348 U. S. 2
stated in the opinion announced by Mr. Chief Justice Vinson,
April 6, 1953, in In re Isserman, 345 U.
MR. JUSTICE REED also calls attention to his dissent in
Sacher v. Association of the Bar, 347 U.
, 347 U. S.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE CLARK did not participate in
the consideration or decision of this matter.