FTC v. Carter Products, Inc., 346 U.S. 327 (1953)
U.S. Supreme Court
FTC v. Carter Products, Inc., 346 U.S. 327 (1953)Federal Trade Commission v. Carter Products, Inc.
No. 114
Decided October 12, 1953
346 U.S. 327
Syllabus
The judgment of the Court of Appeals setting aside a cease and desist order of the Federal Trade Commission is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to reinstate its prior judgment after amending it so as specifically to authorize the Commission to open this proceeding for further evidence and a new order consistent with the opinion of the Court of Appeals.
201 F.2d 446, judgment vacated and cause remanded.
U.S. Supreme Court
FTC v. Carter Products, Inc., 346 U.S. 327 (1953)Federal Trade Commission v. Carter Products, Inc.
No. 114
Decided October 12, 1953
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
The judgment of the Court of Appeals setting aside a cease and desist order of the Federal Trade Commission is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to reinstate its prior judgment after amending it so as specifically to authorize the Commission to open this proceeding for further evidence and a new order consistent with the opinion of the Court of Appeals.
201 F.2d 446, judgment vacated and cause remanded.
PER CURIAM.
Certiorari is granted, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to reinstate its prior judgment and order after amending it so that it specifically authorizes the Federal Trade Commission to open this proceeding for further evidence and a new order consistent with the Court of Appeals opinion herein. Cf. Reilly v. Pinkus, 338 U. S. 269, 338 U. S. 277; Labor Board v. Donnelly Garment Co., 330 U. S. 219, 330 U. S. 224-228.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.