WEBER v. UNITED STATES, 344 U.S. 834 (1952)

U.S. Supreme Court

WEBER v. UNITED STATES , 344 U.S. 834 (1952)

344 U.S. 834

Louis WEBER, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 236.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 13, 1952

Messrs. Howard W. Ameli and James F. Ryan, for petitioner.

Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Murray and Beatrice Rosenberg, for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Denied.

Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER.

This is another instance where I deem it appropriate to indicate what was before us in a petition for certiorari. See State of Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, 338 U.S. 912. One of the questions presented by this petition is the sufficiency of the claim that the verdict was vitiated because publications reflecting adversely on the defendant, before any testimony was taken in the case, precluded a fair and impartial trial. Under the circumstances the Court of Appeals, composed of SWAN, Chief Judge, AUGUSTUS N. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges, rejected the claim while acknowledging that 'such comments by newspapers [ as revealed by the exhibits herein] during the pendency of a criminal trial are inexcusable.2' United States v. Weber, 2 Cir., 197 F.2d 237, 239.

Memorandum filed by Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER.

Footnotes

Footnote 2 'In England it is probable that the publishers would be severely penalized. See cases cited in [State of] Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, 338 U.S. 912, 921-936.'[ Weber v. United States 344 U.S. 834 (1952) ]




U.S. Supreme Court

WEBER v. UNITED STATES , 344 U.S. 834 (1952)

344 U.S. 834

Louis WEBER, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 236.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 13, 1952

Messrs. Howard W. Ameli and James F. Ryan, for petitioner.

Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Murray and Beatrice Rosenberg, for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Denied.

Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER.

This is another instance where I deem it appropriate to indicate what was before us in a petition for certiorari. See State of Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, 338 U.S. 912. One of the questions presented by this petition is the sufficiency of the claim that the verdict was vitiated because publications reflecting adversely on the defendant, before any testimony was taken in the case, precluded a fair and impartial trial. Under the circumstances the Court of Appeals, composed of SWAN, Chief Judge, AUGUSTUS N. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges, rejected the claim while acknowledging that 'such comments by newspapers [ as revealed by the exhibits herein] during the pendency of a criminal trial are inexcusable.2' United States v. Weber, 2 Cir., 197 F.2d 237, 239.

Memorandum filed by Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER.

Footnotes

Footnote 2 'In England it is probable that the publishers would be severely penalized. See cases cited in [State of] Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, 338 U.S. 912, 921-936.'[ Weber v. United States 344 U.S. 834 (1952) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.