Palmer Oil Corp. v. Amerada Petroleum Corp., 342 U.S. 35 (1951)
U.S. Supreme Court
Palmer Oil Corp. v. Amerada Petroleum Corp., 342 U.S. 35 (1951)No. 301
Palmer Oil Corp. v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.
Continued November 5, 1951
342 U.S. 35
Syllabus
These causes are continued for such period as will enable appellants with all convenient speed to secure in an appropriate state proceeding a determination as to the effect on these appeals of the repeal of the state statute whose constitutionality is drawn in question by these appeals.
The decision below is reported in 204 Okla. 543, 231 P.2d 997.
U.S. Supreme Court
Palmer Oil Corp. v. Amerada Petroleum Corp., 342 U.S. 35 (1951)No. 301
Palmer Oil Corp. v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.
Continued November 5, 1951
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
Syllabus
These causes are continued for such period as will enable appellants with all convenient speed to secure in an appropriate state proceeding a determination as to the effect on these appeals of the repeal of the state statute whose constitutionality is drawn in question by these appeals.
The decision below is reported in 204 Okla. 543, 231 P.2d 997.
PER CURIAM.
The Court is advised that, on May 26, 1951, Laws 1951, p. 142, the Oklahoma Legislature repealed Okla.Stat. 1941, Cum.Supp. 1949, Tit. 52, §§ 286.1-286.17, the constitutionality of which is drawn in question by these appeals. The causes are therefore ordered continued for such period as will enable appellants with all convenient speed to secure in an appropriate state proceeding a determination as to the effect of this repeal on the matters raised in these appeals.
Causes continued.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.