Boutell v. Walling
Annotate this Case
327 U.S. 463 (1946)
U.S. Supreme Court
Boutell v. Walling, 327 U.S. 463 (1946)
Boutell v. Walling
Argued October 9, 1945
Decided February 25, 1946
327 U.S. 463
1. Employees of a garage who are engaged exclusively in repairing and maintaining vehicles of a single interstate motor carrier come within the coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act. P. 327 U. S. 466.
2. They are not engaged in a "service establishment the greater part of whose . . . servicing is in intrastate commerce" within the exemption provided by § 13(a)(2) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. P. 327 U. S. 467.
3. Nor do they come within § 13(b)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act exempting
"any employee with respect to whom the Interstate Commerce Commission has power to establish qualifications and maximum hours of service pursuant to the provisions of Section 204 of the Motor Carrier Act, 1935,"
since their employer is not a carrier. P. 327 U. S. 467.
4. The power of the Interstate Commerce Commission to establish maximum hours of service pursuant to the provisions of § 204 of the Motor Carrier Act (Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act) is limited to employees of "carriers." P. 327 U. S. 467.
5. Administrative interpretations of the Fair Labor Standards Act by the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department
of Labor and the Interstate Commerce Act by the Interstate Commerce Commission are entitled to great weight. P. 327 U. S. 471.
148 F.2d 329 affirmed.
In a suit brought by the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor, the District Court enjoined petitioners from violating the maximum hours provisions of § 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 148 F.2d 329. This Court granted certiorari. 3 25 U.S. 849. Affirmed, p. 327 U. S. 472.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.