BRIDGES v. WIXON, 323 U.S. 708 (1945)

U.S. Supreme Court

BRIDGES v. WIXON, 323 U.S. 708 (1945)

323 U.S. 708

Harry BRIDGES, petitioner,
v.
I. F. WIXON, as District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, etc.
No. 788.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 29, 1945

Messrs. Lee Pressman, Richard Gladstein, Henry Cohen, and Mrs. Carol King, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. Chester T. Lane, Robert S. Erdahl, and Leon Ulman, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Granted.

The motion of the Communist Political Association for leave to intervene is denied.

Mr. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.


U.S. Supreme Court

BRIDGES v. WIXON, 323 U.S. 708 (1945)

 323 U.S. 708

Harry BRIDGES, petitioner,
v.
I. F. WIXON, as District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, etc.
No. 788.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 29, 1945

Messrs. Lee Pressman, Richard Gladstein, Henry Cohen, and Mrs. Carol King, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. Chester T. Lane, Robert S. Erdahl, and Leon Ulman, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Granted.

The motion of the Communist Political Association for leave to intervene is denied.

Mr. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.