VAUGHN v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 321 U.S. 751 (1944)

U.S. Supreme Court

VAUGHN v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 321 U.S. 751 (1944)

321 U.S. 751

Richard VAUGHN, d. b. a. Vaughn's Used Cars, appellant,
v.
The BOARD of POLICE COMMISSIONERS of the CITY of LOS ANGELES.
No. 698.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 6, 1944

Messrs. Albert G. Bergman and Bates Booth, for appellant.

Messrs. Ray L. Chesebro, Frederick von Schrader, and Edwin F. Shinn, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. ( 1) Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 552-554, 37 S. Ct. 217, L.R.A.1917F, 514, Ann.Cas.1917C, 643; Lehman v. Board of Accountancy, 263 U.S. 394, 398, 44 S. Ct. 128; cf. Nash v. United States, 229 U.S. 373, 376-377, 33 S. Ct. 780; (2) Caldwell v. Texas, 137 U.S. 692, 698, 11 S. Ct. 224; Bergemann v. Backer, 157 U.S. 655, 656, 15 S. Ct. 727; cf. Dohany v. Rogers, 281 U.S. 362, 369, 50 S. Ct. 299, 68 A.L.R. 434; (3) Cincinnati, N. O . & T. P. R. Co. v. Slade, 216 U.S. 78, 83, 30 S. Ct. 230; Mobile, Jackson & K. C. R. Co. v. Mississippi, 210 U.S. 187, 204, 28 S. Ct. 650.[ Vaughn v. Board of Police Commissioners of City of Los Angeles 321 U.S. 751 (1944) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

VAUGHN v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 321 U.S. 751 (1944)

 321 U.S. 751

Richard VAUGHN, d. b. a. Vaughn's Used Cars, appellant,
v.
The BOARD of POLICE COMMISSIONERS of the CITY of LOS ANGELES.
No. 698.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 6, 1944

Messrs. Albert G. Bergman and Bates Booth, for appellant.

Messrs. Ray L. Chesebro, Frederick von Schrader, and Edwin F. Shinn, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. ( 1) Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 552-554, 37 S. Ct. 217, L.R.A.1917F, 514, Ann.Cas.1917C, 643; Lehman v. Board of Accountancy, 263 U.S. 394, 398, 44 S. Ct. 128; cf. Nash v. United States, 229 U.S. 373, 376-377, 33 S. Ct. 780; (2) Caldwell v. Texas, 137 U.S. 692, 698, 11 S. Ct. 224; Bergemann v. Backer, 157 U.S. 655, 656, 15 S. Ct. 727; cf. Dohany v. Rogers, 281 U.S. 362, 369, 50 S. Ct. 299, 68 A.L.R. 434; (3) Cincinnati, N. O . & T. P. R. Co. v. Slade, 216 U.S. 78, 83, 30 S. Ct. 230; Mobile, Jackson & K. C. R. Co. v. Mississippi, 210 U.S. 187, 204, 28 S. Ct. 650.[ Vaughn v. Board of Police Commissioners of City of Los Angeles 321 U.S. 751 (1944) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.