Hughes v. Wendel, 317 U.S. 134 (1942)
U.S. Supreme Court
Hughes v. Wendel, 317 U.S. 134 (1942)Hughes v. Wendel
No. 176
Decided November 16, 1942
317 U.S. 134
Syllabus
Since the record does not contain the contract nor an adequate summary thereof, appellant's claim of unconstitutional impairment of the obligation of the contract cannot be determined, and the appeal is dismissed. P. 134.
139 Ohio St. 632, 41 N.E.2d 702, appeal dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
Hughes v. Wendel, 317 U.S. 134 (1942)Hughes v. Wendel
No. 176
Decided November 16, 1942
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Syllabus
Since the record does not contain the contract nor an adequate summary thereof, appellant's claim of unconstitutional impairment of the obligation of the contract cannot be determined, and the appeal is dismissed. P. 134.
139 Ohio St. 632, 41 N.E.2d 702, appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant is the owner of a 99-year perpetually renewable lease of which the University of Miami, in Ohio, is lessor, and which has been subjected to assessment of county taxes pursuant to § 5330 of the Ohio General Code. Appellant contends that this statute as applied violates an exemption from taxation granted by § 13 of an Ohio statute of February 17, 1809 (7 Ohio Laws, p. 188), which allegedly became a part of her contract through execution of the lease, and impairs the obligation of her contract contrary to Article I, § 10 of the Constitution. The record, however, does not set forth appellant's lease, and the incomplete summary of it contained in her pleading is not adequate to enable us to determine what her rights may be. Accordingly, we must dismiss the appeal.
Dismissed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.