WEST INDIA OIL CO. v. SANCHO, 311 U.S. 615 (1940)

U.S. Supreme Court

WEST INDIA OIL CO. v. SANCHO, 311 U.S. 615 (1940)

311 U.S. 615

WEST INDIA OIL COMPANY (Puerto Rico), petitioner,
v.
Rafael SANCHO Bonet, Treasurer of Puerto Rico.
No. 26.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 23, 1940

Mr. James R. Beverley, of San Juan, P. R., for petitioner.

Manuel V. Domenech, present Treasurer of Puerto Rico substituted as the party respondent herein in the place and stead of Rafael Sancho Bonet, former Treasurer, on motion of Mr. James R. Beverley for the petitioner.[ West India Oil Co v. Sancho 311 U.S. 615 (1940) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

WEST INDIA OIL CO. v. SANCHO, 311 U.S. 615 (1940)

 311 U.S. 615

WEST INDIA OIL COMPANY (Puerto Rico), petitioner,
v.
Rafael SANCHO Bonet, Treasurer of Puerto Rico.
No. 26.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 23, 1940

Mr. James R. Beverley, of San Juan, P. R., for petitioner.

Manuel V. Domenech, present Treasurer of Puerto Rico substituted as the party respondent herein in the place and stead of Rafael Sancho Bonet, former Treasurer, on motion of Mr. James R. Beverley for the petitioner.[ West India Oil Co v. Sancho 311 U.S. 615 (1940) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.