JOHNSON v. IGLEHEART BROS, 304 U.S. 585 (1938)

U.S. Supreme Court

JOHNSON v. IGLEHEART BROS, 304 U.S. 585 (1938)

304 U.S. 585

D. V. JOHNSON, doing business in name of Tennessee Grain Company, petitioner,
v.
IGLEHEART BROTHERS, Incorporated.*
No. 1015.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 31, 1938

Messrs. Emra H. Ireland, of Evansville, Ind., and Albert Stump, of Indianapolis, Ind., for petitioner.

Messrs. George S. Herr, Oscar McPeak, and Lester E. Waterbury, all of New York City (Mr. Joseph H. Iglehart, of Evansville, Ind., for respondent.

For opinion below, see 95 F.2d 4.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

* Rehearing denied 59 S. Ct. 59, 83 L.Ed. --.[ Johnson v. Igleheart Bros 304 U.S. 585 (1938) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

JOHNSON v. IGLEHEART BROS, 304 U.S. 585 (1938)

 304 U.S. 585

D. V. JOHNSON, doing business in name of Tennessee Grain Company, petitioner,
v.
IGLEHEART BROTHERS, Incorporated.*
No. 1015.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 31, 1938

Messrs. Emra H. Ireland, of Evansville, Ind., and Albert Stump, of Indianapolis, Ind., for petitioner.

Messrs. George S. Herr, Oscar McPeak, and Lester E. Waterbury, all of New York City (Mr. Joseph H. Iglehart, of Evansville, Ind., for respondent.

For opinion below, see 95 F.2d 4.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

* Rehearing denied 59 S. Ct. 59, 83 L.Ed. --.[ Johnson v. Igleheart Bros 304 U.S. 585 (1938) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.